Today was a pretty normal day with the usual visits to the restaurant form Breakfast, Lunch and Dinner. There is limited choice for food regarding my diet issues but for the rest of guests its perfect.
We pulled in to a number of different ports during the day with passengers getting off and joining tours from snowboarding, dog sledging, u name it they have it but all at a cost.
Late in the afternoon we crossed over the Artic Circle for the second time only on this occasion it was Southbound.
On the Northbound leg there is a ceremony held on deck with glasses of shampoo and the opportunity for the sea devil to come and pour freezing cold water with ice lumps down your back which is a nasty shock to the system. We did not join on the Northbound celebration as Noel was suffering health wise and so no a good idea to stand on deck for a while.
At one port we watched them loading pallets of garden fertilizer and at another boxes of fish with the hungry seagulls waiting for a dropped box or at least spillage.
In the afternoon e decided that an additional two night stay, already part of our original plan, was on and so we needed to find a nice Hotel for two nights. The one we stayed in upon arrival in Bergen ten days ago, was sort of Ok, the shower was a handheld in the bath with no rails to hold on to which I require and so this time the Radisson Blue Bergen Hotel does have proper walk in showers and a much bigger and more friendly area to sit and wait on Wednesday before leaving for the airport. I believe the Airport bus also stops outside the Hotel and this will save us a taxi ride I believe.
I may have mentioned the collection to employ consultant on our attempt to overturn a Woking Council decision to possibly allow the building of over 500 houses and travellers sites next door to our Estate and within 30 hours all the money had been collected , not bad really with still a few laggards not paying or away from home etc. however the magic figure of £12K seems to have been reached.
The weather today was mixed and for about an hour this morning we sat on the balcony in the sun enjoying the fresh air except for when the diesel fork lift loading stuff in the hold down below us passed us by.
As I am writing this we are pulling in to the Port of Sandnessjoen which is quite small but the main town on this area of the coast. As usual u can leave the ship for some tours including watching salmon swim, a bit like watching my KOI in Weybridge
.jpeg)



To honor this history, Richard With and Vesterålen are used by Hurtigruten, one of the two operators of the coastal route today, as names for two of its vessels.
The first journey was from Trondheim to Hammerfest, with port calls at Rørvik, Brønnøy, Sandnessjøen, Bodø, Svolvær, Lødingen, Harstad, Tromsø and Skjervøy. The journey to Hammerfest took 67 hours, at which point the Vesteraalen turned around and headed back for Trondheim.
Following the early success of Vesteraalen, a second ship, Sirius from the Bergen-based company Det Bergenske Dampskibsselskab (BDS) was put into service on the Hurtigruten route.
Towards a Daily Service
Several other transport companies obtained the rights to operate ferries on the coastal route, which continued to vary in port calls and timetable.
Smoked halibut on the Hurtigruten.
Lightly smoked halibut is one of the specialities served onboard Norway’s Hurtigruten coastal cruise ... [+]
DAVID NIKEL
Initially the route served Trondheim to Tromsø year-round, and Hammerfest in the summer. For many years, different companies operated ships on different sections of the route, including from Stavanger to Bergen, a section no longer in operation.
During the 1930s, daily services were offered, attracting more than 230,000 passengers annually. However, it was not until 1953 that a daily connection was established at all ports of call between Bergen and Kirkenes, a route plan that has stayed in place, with some alterations, ever since.
Today, 34 ports are served on the full 11-night itinerary, most but not all on both the northbound and southbound legs of the roundtrip.
From Coastal Ferry to Tourism
The transition from coastal ferry to a cruise-like experience for tourists was a gradual one. From the 1960s, local airport infrastructure began to improve across Norway, as did the road infrastructure for longer journeys. This provided competition to the coastal route for both passenger transit and cargo.
To remain economically viable, operators began to put more emphasis on tourism. In the 1980s, newer ships were bigger with more attention given to public areas and dining facilities.
Gradually, the Norwegian coastal voyage became a big hit with international tourists, while retaining its core function of a local ferry.
Havila Capella coastal cruise ship in Ålesund, Norway.
Havila Capella is one of four new ships from Havila Voyages operating on the classic Hurtigruten ... [+]
DAVID NIKEL
In 2006, the name Hurtigruten was adopted by a new ferry company formed from the merger of two previous Hurtigruten operators: Ofotens og Vesteraalens Dampskibsselskab (OVDS) and Troms Fylkes Dampskibsselskap (TFDS). At this point, the government oficially termed the route Kystruten (The Coastal Route), to distingush the coastal route from the new company.
In 2017, the Norwegian government announced it wanted multiple operators to operate the coastal route once again. 








.jpeg)

.jpeg)


